A new study published in the Royal Society of Chemistry has compared the efficiency and energy consumption of 12 different carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods. The research was led by Graphyte CTO Hannah Murnen and CEO Barclay Rogers, in collaboration with Daniel L. Sanchez and Peter Psarras. Their goal was to create a standardized framework for evaluating engineered carbon removal solutions.
The study reviewed various approaches, including Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW), biochar production, biomass sludge sequestration, Direct Air Capture (DAC), and Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS). It assessed these technologies based on their carbon removal efficiency and energy consumption requirements.
>> RELATED: Google Contracts Over $100M in Carbon Removal Credits in 2024
Using a baseline efficiency model, the research identified the most effective CDR approaches. The top-performing technologies included:
>> In Other News: NewHydrogen CEO Steve Hill and University of Waterloo Expert Explore Integration of Hydrogen in Microgrids and Smart Grids
The study revealed that biomass-based solutions generally have higher efficiency compared to Direct Air Capture (DAC). Biomass approaches demonstrated carbon removal efficiencies ranging from 0.55 to 0.96, whereas DAC methods scored between 0.06 and 0.15.
This gap exists because biomass already contains concentrated CO2, making the removal process more straightforward and less energy-intensive. However, researchers caution that biomass conversion can lead to carbon losses, reducing its overall impact.
"We’re seeing promising results from biomass-based removal, but efficiency losses during processing remain a challenge," said Barclay Rogers.
Companies like Charm Industrial, Carbonfuture, and XPRIZE Carbon Removal winner Takachar are advancing biochar production and biomass-based sequestration techniques to improve efficiency and scalability.
The study also analyzed how much energy each method requires per ton of CO2 removed. Unsurprisingly, DAC technology has the highest energy consumption, requiring between 10 and 12 GJ per ton of CO2 captured.
By comparison:
Despite its energy intensity, DAC efficiency improves significantly when powered by renewable energy. However, weather conditions can impact performance, with solid sorbent DAC dropping from 83% to 77% efficiency in unfavorable climates.
Leading companies in Direct Air Capture include Climeworks, Carbon Engineering, and Heirloom Carbon, all of which are working to scale DAC technology while reducing its energy requirements.
The findings from this study highlight the importance of balancing efficiency with energy consumption when evaluating CDR technologies. The results suggest that low-energy biomass solutions could be a viable near-term strategy, while DAC may require further innovation to improve efficiency.
"Understanding energy use and efficiency trade-offs is crucial as we scale carbon removal solutions," said Hannah Murnen.
Companies like Google and Stripe are making major investments in carbon removal, funding projects across ERW, biochar, DAC, and BECCS. As governments and corporations push for net-zero goals, these insights will help guide investments toward the most effective carbon removal solutions.
With ongoing research and innovation, the CDR industry continues to evolve, bringing new opportunities for scalable climate solutions.
Follow the money flow of climate, technology, and energy investments to uncover new opportunities and jobs.
Inside This Issue 💰 BlackRock’s €1 Billion Bet on Eni Fuels Carbon Capture Confidence 💧 Wastewater Contaminants Boost Green Hydrogen Production 🌾 Gevo Sells Carbon Credits from North Dakota Asset ...
Inside This Issue 🛢️ Texas Emerges as Blue Ammonia Capital in $5B Investment Wave 🤝 Technip Energies and Shell Catalysts & Technologies Have Signed a Global Alliance Agreement for Carbon Captu...
Inside This Issue 💰 Industrial Giants Are Sitting on a $200 Billion Energy Goldmine 🗺️ New Reports Map BC’s Hydrogen Potential for Clean Energy Growth 🍁 Federal Government Spending Nearly $16M on ...
BWXT Fires Up Furnace for Advanced Nuclear Fuel
The chemical vapor infiltration furnace at BWX Technologies’s Lynchburg Technology Center in Lynchburg, Virginia. The furnace is manufactured by AVS, Incorporated. Source: BWXT LYNCHBURG, Va.--BWX...
Producers Midstream Secures Strategic Commitments for Phase Two Expansion in the Delaware Basin
Enhancement Will Increase Processing Capacity to 90 MMscfd and Introduce Advanced Acid Gas Injection Capabilities DALLAS, July 22, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Producers Midstream II, LLC ("Producers Mids...
United States: TotalEnergies Expands Its Investments in Sustainable Forestry Operations to Preserve Carbon Sinks PARIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--TotalEnergies (Paris:TTE) (LSE:TTE) (NYSE:TTE) signed an ag...
Led by J.P. Morgan, this facility represents a significant step towards scalability for nature-based carbon projects. NEW YORK, July 22, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Chestnut Carbon ("Chestnut"), a natu...
Follow the money flow of climate, technology, and energy investments to uncover new opportunities and jobs.