A new study published in the Royal Society of Chemistry has compared the efficiency and energy consumption of 12 different carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods. The research was led by Graphyte CTO Hannah Murnen and CEO Barclay Rogers, in collaboration with Daniel L. Sanchez and Peter Psarras. Their goal was to create a standardized framework for evaluating engineered carbon removal solutions.
The study reviewed various approaches, including Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW), biochar production, biomass sludge sequestration, Direct Air Capture (DAC), and Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS). It assessed these technologies based on their carbon removal efficiency and energy consumption requirements.
>> RELATED: Google Contracts Over $100M in Carbon Removal Credits in 2024
Using a baseline efficiency model, the research identified the most effective CDR approaches. The top-performing technologies included:
>> In Other News: NewHydrogen CEO Steve Hill and University of Waterloo Expert Explore Integration of Hydrogen in Microgrids and Smart Grids
The study revealed that biomass-based solutions generally have higher efficiency compared to Direct Air Capture (DAC). Biomass approaches demonstrated carbon removal efficiencies ranging from 0.55 to 0.96, whereas DAC methods scored between 0.06 and 0.15.
This gap exists because biomass already contains concentrated CO2, making the removal process more straightforward and less energy-intensive. However, researchers caution that biomass conversion can lead to carbon losses, reducing its overall impact.
"We’re seeing promising results from biomass-based removal, but efficiency losses during processing remain a challenge," said Barclay Rogers.
Companies like Charm Industrial, Carbonfuture, and XPRIZE Carbon Removal winner Takachar are advancing biochar production and biomass-based sequestration techniques to improve efficiency and scalability.
The study also analyzed how much energy each method requires per ton of CO2 removed. Unsurprisingly, DAC technology has the highest energy consumption, requiring between 10 and 12 GJ per ton of CO2 captured.
By comparison:
Despite its energy intensity, DAC efficiency improves significantly when powered by renewable energy. However, weather conditions can impact performance, with solid sorbent DAC dropping from 83% to 77% efficiency in unfavorable climates.
Leading companies in Direct Air Capture include Climeworks, Carbon Engineering, and Heirloom Carbon, all of which are working to scale DAC technology while reducing its energy requirements.
The findings from this study highlight the importance of balancing efficiency with energy consumption when evaluating CDR technologies. The results suggest that low-energy biomass solutions could be a viable near-term strategy, while DAC may require further innovation to improve efficiency.
"Understanding energy use and efficiency trade-offs is crucial as we scale carbon removal solutions," said Hannah Murnen.
Companies like Google and Stripe are making major investments in carbon removal, funding projects across ERW, biochar, DAC, and BECCS. As governments and corporations push for net-zero goals, these insights will help guide investments toward the most effective carbon removal solutions.
With ongoing research and innovation, the CDR industry continues to evolve, bringing new opportunities for scalable climate solutions.
Follow the money flow of climate, technology, and energy investments to uncover new opportunities and jobs.
Inside the Issue 🌍 The Future of Carbon Removal: ENGIE’s Scientific Council Ranks DACCS as the Most Promising Technology 🔋 Southwire Taps Plug Power, Inc. to Advance Carbon Reduction from the Supp...
Inside This Issue 🔋 Baker Hughes and Woodside Energy Join Forces to Power a Low-Carbon Future 🏭 8 Rivers and Wood Sign Pre-FEED Agreement for Wyoming Carbon Capture Project ⚡ CERAWEEK: Gas Compani...
Inside This Issue 🏗️ Heidelberg Materials North America Announces Funding Commitment from Government of Canada in Support of its Groundbreaking Edmonton CCUS Project ⚙️ dynaCERT Prepares Completio...
Solid Carbon Receiving $24M to Advance Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal
The University of Victoria (UVic) welcomes today’s announcement of $24 million over six years through the Government of Canada’s New Frontiers in Research Fund (NFRF) to advance the Solid Carbon re...
Climate Impact and Purus Marine Join Forces on Net-Zero Hydrogen Supply
Renewable hydrogen investor, developer and manager Climate Impact Corporation (CIC) and shipping company Purus Marine have agreed to develop a net-zero shipping pathway for CIC’s renewable hydrogen...
Southwire Taps Plug Power, Inc. to Advance Carbon Reduction from the Supply Chain
Plug penetrates the industrial supplier market with new agreement by demonstrating a sustainable option to lead acid batteries SLINGERLANDS, N.Y., March 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Southwire, a l...
Capture6 Secures $27.5 Million to Scale Carbon Removal and Water Recovery
A New Approach to Climate and Water Security Capture6, a company pioneering water-positive carbon removal solutions, has secured $27.5 million in Series A and project funding. The investment, led ...
Follow the money flow of climate, technology, and energy investments to uncover new opportunities and jobs.