Fourteen of Canada’s biggest oil and gas executives, backed by Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, are turning up the heat on the federal government’s carbon pricing system. They've made it clear: they want the policy scrapped. Their argument? The current system is making it harder for Canada’s energy sector to stay competitive.
This coordinated move comes as Canada faces new global pressures. With U.S. tariff threats looming, Canadian energy leaders are calling for a shift in priorities—from climate targets to economic stability.
At the center of the debate is the Pathways Alliance, a group representing the country’s top oil sands producers. Their massive carbon capture project was shaped around the existing pricing policy. But now, even they are questioning whether the current approach works.

The federal carbon pricing system, introduced in 2019, was supposed to curb pollution. It charges companies when their emissions go over a set limit. Over time, that was meant to push them toward cleaner operations.
But this week, things escalated. The 14 oil and gas CEOs signed an open letter demanding the repeal of the policy. They argue that letting provinces design their own carbon strategies would make more sense.
“This is about recognizing the unique needs of each province and industry,” one executive stated. They believe Ottawa’s one-size-fits-all approach is doing more harm than good.
Pathways Alliance didn’t hold back either. In a public statement, the group labeled the carbon pricing system as “uncompetitive”. According to them, it’s slowing down growth in Canada’s vital oil sands sector.
The push to end carbon pricing isn't just coming from business leaders. Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Conservative Party, has made it a top campaign issue.
He’s promised to scrap the system if he wins the April 28 election. Instead, Poilievre plans to roll out federal tax incentives to motivate emissions cuts. Under his plan, provinces would get the final say on whether and how to price carbon.
It’s a sharp contrast to the current model. And it’s clearly gaining traction among energy executives who say they’re tired of federal red tape.
This policy shift could throw a wrench into Pathways Alliance’s plans. Their proposed multi-billion-dollar carbon capture and storage (CCS) project was designed around the federal carbon pricing model. Without it, the entire structure of their investment might need to change.
Still, Pathways isn't sitting on its hands. The group has been in ongoing discussions with the federal government, exploring a potential backup plan if the pricing system disappears. But so far, no deal has been made.
And that uncertainty is starting to weigh on investor confidence.

>> In Other News: CMB.TECH and MOL Sign Landmark Agreement for Nine Ammonia-powered Vessels
One thing energy leaders seem to agree on: they need predictability. Constant changes in federal policy make it harder to plan long-term projects, especially ones involving massive capital and tech investment.
“Companies can adapt, but they need a clear runway,” said one executive. “It’s the stop-and-start nature of federal policy that’s hurting us.”
The CEOs behind the open letter aren’t denying climate change. They say they’re still committed to cutting emissions. But they believe economic growth doesn’t have to take a backseat to environmental goals.
This pushback reveals a deeper divide in Canada’s climate conversation. How do you balance environmental responsibility with economic reality?
Critics of the current carbon pricing model say it’s tilted too far toward idealism. Supporters argue it’s one of the few tools Canada has to hit its climate targets.
Meanwhile, the rest of the world is watching. Countries like the U.S. are using tax credits and market incentives to drive clean innovation. That’s the approach Poilievre and the oil CEOs say they prefer.
With an election just weeks away, the future of Canada’s climate policy could hinge on who wins.
If Poilievre takes office, expect a swift move away from carbon pricing toward tax-based incentives. If the current government holds on, the carbon system will likely stay—though maybe with some tweaks to address competitiveness concerns.
One thing’s for sure: this isn’t just a political fight—it’s a business one too. And the outcome will shape Canada’s energy landscape for years to come.
Follow the money flow of climate, technology, and energy investments to uncover new opportunities and jobs.
Inside This Issue 🛫 Methanol-to-Jet Clears the ASTM Gate. What Changes Now? 🌿 InPlanet Selected as the Brazilian Supplier in Whirlpool Corporation's Durable Carbon Removal Portfolio 🧲 Climeworks A...
Inside This Issue 🌿 How Montana Renewables Cut MaxSAF Capex 89% 📋 IRS Issues Notice on 45Z Clean Fuel Production Tax Credit to Support Domestic Biofuel Production and American Agriculture 🌊 Natura...
Inside This Issue 🌬️ U.S. Bank Makes First Carbon Removal Purchase with Carba's Minnesota Biochar Project 🏭 Michigan's CCS Primacy Bid Could Reshape Great Lakes Industry 🏗️ Europe's Largest Carbo...
In the largest rice methane offtake to date, Mitti Labs will deliver one million high-integrity credits to Google by 2030 BENGALURU, India and SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 10, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Deep-t...
Climeworks Announces Key Performance Improvements at Mammoth
Over the past 18 months, technology upgrades have more than doubled CO₂ capture performance in upgraded collector containers while reducing operating costs by more than 50%. Zurich, Switzerland | ...
A team member at one of InPlanet’s partner farms inspects freshly harvested citrus fruit to assess its quality Remineralizer integrated into the soil following field application, beginning the enh...
Methanol-to-Jet Clears ASTM Gate. What Changes Now?
Methanol-to-jet has crossed a critical technical gate for commercial aviation fuel. ASTM D7566-26a, the active specification updated July 30, 2026, incorporates methanol into the Annex A5 alcohol-t...
Follow the money flow of climate, technology, and energy investments to uncover new opportunities and jobs.